I'll just let the exchange speak for itself:

[My reply - reads in reverse chronological order]

So which is more wrong - being homosexual, or taking advantage of older homosexuals by flirting with them, and offering them attention while accepting their generosity and gifts?

-----Original Message-----
From: david [mailto:@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 12:58 AM
To: @.com
Subject: RE: Reading assignment


dont give me your "conditioned response" bull%#$%@#$......as always, YOUR
the one who always seems to ignore the other main points of my letters, so
it is YOU who is blocking my friend.

admit it, homosexuality is wrong. its immoral, its unholy, and it defiles
everything thats beatiful about sex between a man and a woman. those are
the facts.

you can justify homosexuality all you want, doesnt mean your right.

its WRONG....how hard is that to get?


>From: "" <@.com>
>Reply-To: <@.com>
>To: "'david '" <>
>Subject: RE: Reading assignment
>Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:39:25 -0500
>
>He says quite clearly that God never DID send homosexuals down here and
>then tell us not to be homosexuals. It seems you didn't read the text,
>just assumed what it said, and then reacted out of your conditioned
>response.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: david [mailto:]
>Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 1:36 AM
>To:
>Subject: RE: Reading assignment
>
>
>that would be something to discuss in person cause it would take me all
>night to type out explantions, thoughts, etc.
>
>i guess my thoughts in a nutshell are...
>
>
>this so called "biblical approach" to advocating homosexuality is just
>another MAN'S interpretation of what he thinks certain biblical verses
>mean.
>
> whos to say his interpretation is right? because hes studied? other
>people who've studied just as much disagree with these interpretations.
>without a prophet and personal prayer for answers to which
>interpretations are correct, you'd be up a creek.....however there is a
>ture and living prophet in these times. listen to him. or if you dont
>want to, get down on
>
>your knees and ask got with an OPEN heart if this manuscript is true.
>see what kind of answers you get.
>
>the bible so clearly teaches that homosexuality is wrong the topic isnt
>really worth the time to debate. i think because alot of gay people
>out there know homosexuality is wrong, they seek to justify their
>actions, even stooping to twist the word of god this way and that in a
>desperate effort to prove their actions credible to god, cause they know that if in fact they are doing something wrong, it wont be "pleasing" to god to say the
>least.
>
>i especially hate how this guy says that homosexuality isnt a
>lifestyle, its unchangeable. bull#$%@%
>why would god send you down here, tell you not to do something, then
>make it so you pretty much have to do what you were asked not to. doesnt make
>sense. read your bible, the 1st commandment god gave was to multiply
>and replenish the earth. god created adam and eve, not adam and steve.
>how in the world are you gonna fulfill that commandment with a
>boyfriend??? not gonna happen. that commandment was directed toward
>all of us my friend, not
>
>just some of us. why would god create you in a way that would be
>contradictory to his 1st commandment.. doesnt make sense.
>
>this letter is one big long justification attempt. i guess this joker
>who wrote this can justify his way to hell as far as im concerned.
>(one of my fav. sayings.) you can attempt to justify anything. as for
>the going to hell part, thats not for me to decide, thats up to god.
>anyways, well have to sit down one night and go through all this stuff.
>it'd get interesting